Hakeem Jeffries' Meeting with Jared Kushner Sparks Backlash

Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog.

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' meeting with Jared Kushner, the president’s influential son-in-law, has ignited significant backlash from within his own party and from other critics of Donald Trump.

This reported meeting occurs just months before the November midterm elections, where Democrats are widely expected to regain control of the US House of Representatives, a scenario that would position Jeffries for the role of Speaker.

Should Democrats secure a majority, they are anticipated to leverage their oversight authority to conduct thorough investigations into the Trump administration, including scrutiny of any potential self-enrichment by the president and his family.

Long-standing concerns persist regarding conflicts of interest, particularly in relation to Kushner's continued financial dealings with foreign nations while simultaneously engaging in foreign affairs, including matters concerning Ukraine, Iran, and Gaza.

When questioned about the reported meeting, Jeffries issued a statement:

Throughout this Congress, Republicans have adopted a my-way-or-the-highway approach to governing that has failed the American people. To stop the madness, we have repeatedly made clear that an extremist approach will not work and will be met with forceful opposition.

The American people want bold change and that’s what House Democrats will deliver. In every conversation that we have with the Trump administration, we will continue to make it explicitly clear that the affordability crisis is not a hoax and nothing short of transformational policy change is acceptable. We are fighting for an affordable America. The question is whether Republicans will join us.

Nevertheless, the news of this meeting drew criticism from figures like Tommy Vietor, a former aide to President Barack Obama and co-host of the podcast "Pod Save America."

“Jared Kushner has no actual government job; he just uses his family connections to get money from gulf autocrats and fund corrupt deals. The only way [Jeffries] should work with him is with demands for documents and subpoenas,” Vietor posted.

During an interview on NBC’s "Meet the Press" on Sunday, Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, addressed the meeting, stating, “I’m in favor of people meeting with whoever they want to discuss ideas. But it’s one thing to have a meeting. It’s another thing to see something real come out of that.”

Adam Kinzinger, a former Republican congressman from Illinois and a vocal Trump critic, who also served on a House committee investigating the Capitol attack, commented on the meeting, posting, “Make this make sense,” while tagging Jeffries.

In other related news:

• Tim Scott defended his fellow South Carolina Republican Senator Darline Graham's grasp of national security issues ahead of their state's runoff election.
• In Alaska, a former mayor endorsed incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan over a challenger with the same name, adding an unusual element to the Senate race.
• A report revealed that Natalie Harp, an aide to Donald Trump, posted numerous pro-Trump messages on a now-disabled social media account on the day of the January 6th Capitol attack.
• Concerns have been raised by voting experts that the Trump administration's efforts to cast doubt on election integrity could lead to a declaration of a national emergency.
• Iran's foreign minister dismissed the threat of new US sanctions as "desperate," while the Iranian president acknowledged the nation's economic difficulties.

Analysis:

The meeting between House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries and Jared Kushner has ignited a firestorm of criticism, particularly from within the Democratic party and among those who have been staunch critics of the Trump administration. The timing of the meeting, just months before crucial midterm elections where Democrats aim to regain control of the House, has raised eyebrows and fueled speculation about potential political motivations or strategies.

Jeffries' public statement emphasizes the Democratic agenda of pursuing "bold change" and addressing the "affordability crisis," framing any interactions as part of a broader effort to push for transformational policy. However, critics like Tommy Vietor argue that any engagement with Kushner, given his business dealings and family ties to the former president, should be strictly limited to formal investigative processes, such as demanding documents and issuing subpoenas.

The core of the controversy lies in the perception of potential conflicts of interest and the optics of engaging with a figure closely associated with a past administration that Democrats have vowed to investigate. The sentiment expressed by Senator Chris Van Hollen, that a meeting is one thing but tangible outcomes are another, reflects a cautious approach many are taking, suggesting that any perceived collaboration without concrete positive results could be politically damaging.

The broader context of the Trump administration's actions, including efforts to undermine election integrity and controversial foreign policy dealings, looms large over these discussions. For critics, any engagement that doesn't clearly align with holding the Trump administration accountable for its past actions risks undermining those efforts and appearing to normalize or legitimize individuals involved.

The situation highlights the delicate balance politicians must strike between maintaining open lines of communication for potential bipartisan cooperation and upholding partisan principles and the pursuit of accountability for past actions.

Hakeem Jeffries' Meeting with Jared Kushner Sparks Fierce Backlash

Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog.

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries’ meeting with Jared Kushner, the president’s influential son-in-law, has sparked backlash from his own party and other Donald Trump critics.

The reported meeting comes months ahead of the November midterm elections in which Democrats are favored to retake the US House, a development that would make Jeffries speaker.

If they are in the majority, Democrats are expected to use their oversight power to aggressively investigate the Trump administration, including self-enrichment by the president and his family.

There are longstanding conflict-of-interest concerns about the way Kushner has continued to make money from foreign nations as he works on foreign affairs, including conflicts in Ukraine, Iran and Gaza.

Asked about the reported meeting, Jeffries said in a statement:

Throughout this Congress, Republicans have adopted a my-way-or-the-highway approach to governing that has failed the American people. To stop the madness, we have repeatedly made clear that an extremist approach will not work and will be met with forceful opposition.

The American people want bold change and that’s what House Democrats will deliver. In every conversation that we have with the Trump administration, we will continue to make it explicitly clear that the affordability crisis is not a hoax and nothing short of transformational policy change is acceptable. We are fighting for an affordable America. The question is whether Republicans will join us.

Nonetheless, among some who lamented the reported gathering was Tommy Vietor, previously an aide to former president Barack Obama and now a co-host of the left-leaning podcast Pod Save America.

“Jared Kushner has no actual government job he just uses his family connections to get money from gulf autocrats and fund corrupt deals. The only way [Jeffries] should work with him is with demands for documents and subpoenas,” Vietor posted.

Asked whether he supported the meeting during an interview on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, Senator Chris van Hollen – a Maryland Democrat – said: “I’m in favor of people meeting with whoever they want to discuss ideas. But it’s one thing to have a meeting. It’s another thing to see something real come out of that.”

Adam Kinzinger, a former Republican congressman from Illinois who is an outspoken Trump critic and served on a House committee that investigated the Capitol attack, posted in reference to the meeting, “Make this make sense,” while tagging Jeffries.

Read the full story here:

In other developments:

• Tim Scott defended fellow US South Carolina Republican senator Darline Graham’s knowledge of national security issues ahead of their state’s runoff election on Tuesday. Graham, who was appointed to fill the Senate seat held by her brother Lindsey Graham after his sudden death in July, is in a Republican primary runoff against South Carolina congressman Ralph Norman.
• Dan Sullivan supports Dan Sullivan against Dan Sullivan in Alaska’s US Senate election, says a former Alaska mayor who recently backed the race’s Republican incumbent over a challenger sharing their name. That development provided another of multiple absurd elements to Dan S Sullivan’s campaign for a third term in the US Senate, which – beside Mary Peltola, a former Alaska Democratic congresswoman – has drawn opposition from Dan J Sullivan.
• The Donald Trump aide Natalie Harp flooded a since-disabled social media account with pro-Trump posts on the day that the president’s supporters attacked the US Capitol in early 2021, years before she went to work for him and developed an extraordinary close relationship with him, a new report has revealed.
• A series of moves by Donald Trump’s administration to sow doubt in the integrity of US elections has intensified concern among voting experts – and sparked hope among election deniers – that it could declare a national emergency. The White House and US federal agencies have released a string of documents this summer – including disputed analyses of alleged voting by noncitzens and historical intelligence memos – stoking expectations that the US president could move to exert greater control over November’s US midterm elections.
• Iran’s foreign minister has dismissed the threat of a fresh round of US economic sanctions as a “desperate” ploy, even as its president acknowledged that the Iranian people are facing “many problems” amid Washington’s efforts to isolate and debilitate the country’s economy.